Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

This is Part 2 of the Lovelady film expose'. I am going to expose it for what it is, a colossal fraud. As we return to the dual gifs, let's take note of the differences between them.

Obviously, the angles aren't the same, but that's because there were two cameramen, and they weren't filming from the same spot. Hughes was farther away. Also, the colors aren't the same; note the bright purple coat on the woman on right which is nothing like what we see on the left. And, the overall lighting isn't the same, where it is much brighter on the right. Notice that the cop who enters the building just disappears into blackness on the left, while on the right, you can see that he turns around and remains in view. You never lose sight of him. He never disappears into the inky blackness. 

So, why such a severe contrast in lighting? Obviously, the conditions were the same. So, was there that much of a difference between the cameras? What's weird is that the camera on the left produced a much more clear, sharp, and focused image, but the colors are dull, whereas the image on the right is much more blurry and less detailed, but the colors are vivid, and the overall lighting is much greater. They must have really cranked up the fill-light.

But, who are these people? 

  
Who is the man in the Fedora hat? I wonder if he's Jack Ruby. Who is the old woman on right? Who are the guys in the hard hats? Who is the woman with the curly blond hair who is practically invisible on the right? Who is the woman in the white scarf next to her? Who are all these people? 

We know that during the motorcade, the doorway was populated by TSBD employees: Frazier and Shelley and Sarah Stanton and Joe Molina, etc. etc. We know it's supposed to be Lovelady on the right, but that can't be him because Lovelady left for the railroad tracks right away with Shelley, never to return. So, when they made this phony thing, they forgot to check Lovelady's testimony to see if he could have been there at the time. He couldn't.  

The only person I recognize is Bonnie Ray Williams, but he was up on the 5th floor during the motorcade. We have a picture of him. 

The footage was taken shortly after the assassination, so Williams came down, and went outside to mill around? I wonder how he came down because the elevators weren't working for a while. Baker had to take the stairs to go up. So, did Williams and them wait for the elevator or take the stairs? And what was Williams doing milling around in front? 

But, we have other images of the people who populated the doorway after the assassination. This is from the Darnell film, and it's just seconds after.

 What a change from the Altgens doorway and the Wiegman doorway. So, at this point, the cops hadn't arrived yet. We've got Prayer Man in the corner. There is a big brawny guy in white in the center who was definitely not skinny Buell Frazier, even though fools claim it. Let's go in a little closer.

We're getting pretty blurry there, but I don't see anyone else I recognize. There is no one who correlates to the footage we are studying. 

I find it strange that those people would be there. Who are they? Unless you were connected to the TSBD, why would you be there? You think the guy in the Fedora hat worked at the TSBD? Who is he? It's only been 50 years. And who is the old woman with the handbag on the right? Did she work there too? Who is she? Who's the woman in the scarf? Who's the woman with the curly hair? What are they waiting for? What are they looking for? Why are they parked there? 

Here's the Jim Murray photo from shortly after the assassination, and the crowd looks different.

There isn't anyone I can match to the gifs. But, let's move on to the William Allen images of the doorway because these were taken between 12:30 and 1:00 PM.

That may be the same guy from the Jim Murray image. Let's try another that is also designated between 12:30 and 1:00.

Nope, nobody matches there. We don't see any of the same people from the gifs. This next one is also designated by Robin Unger as being between 12:30 and 1. 

The police took over the scene very quickly, and it wasn't long before the regular bystanders were gone. But, the point is that William Allen never captured any of the people who were captured in the Hughes film and the so-called Martin film. 

Some might say that these two gifs confirm each other, but I say they are both under a cloud of suspicion. So, something else is needed. Are there any other images, either still or moving, that confirm the presence of these particular individuals in that spot?  

Here's a Phil Willis shot:

Aha! I think that may be the same guy from Allen and Murray. 

Could it be the same guy? It just might be. That's what I am trying to do with the people in the gifs. But so far, I haven't found any other images to confirm any of them.

I am telling you that it is altered footage because Lovelady was not there at the time. He told us so himself. So, they can't be Lovelady, and they're not even the same impostor.

The man on the right was a much smaller man with a much smaller head, and he was also balder. And how does it mesh with this?

That is supposed to be the same guy on the right in each of the collages above. But, how could that be?

So, where did the wild image on the right come from? It didn't come from us. It came from Robin Unger. So, it's the other side that is claiming it, not us. They put it forward to demonstrate that Lovelady's shirt was propped open like Doorman's. But, what about the weird shirt pattern? That isn't a match to anybody. So, where did it come from? 

Here is what happened:  The gifs that Unger made don't tell the whole story. The Hughes footage of this guy started earlier. It starts with him over by the east wall. Then, he walks over to the center of the doorway. Then it continues as per the other film. The image on the right is taken from that early part which has no correlation to Martin, and that's why you don't see it in the gif. And I'm sure it's had a lot of work done to it. The colors we're seeing were all photoshopped in, and it's the same for the tufts of hair which look like a Mohawk. 

That hair sticking straight up was painted on there. How do they expect to get away with this shit? There is a lot of fakery in this image. He doesn't even look photographic. He looks more like a cartoon, doesn't he? And again, they really went to town on photoshopping the colors. But, why did they do it that way? Why didn't they give him a plaid shirt? That isn't plaid. Wasn't plaid the whole idea? The idea that Lovelady wore plaid? And is there any chance his shirt actually looked like that? No, of course not. What shirt manufacturer would put out a shirt of that design and expect to sell it? Look at it! What do you call that? It's noise. It's crap. It isn't real. So, why did they do it that way? 

There is a reason, and I'll explain. It had to do with what they started with in the Hughes film, that is, the part that has no correlation to Martin- the part that came before.  We'll start with that next time.