Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Near the end of the Hughes film, there is a clip that supposedly corresponds to the one with Gorilla Man. We don't know where the one with Gorilla Man came from. Officially, it's supposed to be from the Martin film. But, here's the Martin film. See if you can find it in there. 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DAMyZH2vnbQ


Am I supposed to believe that somebody took a pair of scissors to the Martin film and excised the 6 second clip of Gorilla Man? 

Well, no-can-do, so the claim that the Gorilla Man clip came from the Martin film is rejected. When somebody shows me an intact version of the Martin film that includes it, then I'll reconsider. Until then, the Gorilla Man clip shall be designated as the unsourced footage. It's 6 seconds long, and it only occurs in compilations, such as the DCA compilation. 

On the right below is the figure from end of the Hughes film who supposedly corresponds to Gorilla Man, where it is supposed to be the exact same thing. It is supposed to be that Martin and Hughes filmed the same thing at the same time. And this is what they got: 

That is supposed to be the same guy at the same time. So obviously, it has to be the same clothes. But, the image on the right is usually shown as this:

I suspect the above image has been photoshopped, as there is no version of the Hughes film in which he appears as crisp and vibrantly colored as that. Plus, his skin color is stark white; his hair is like a Mohawk; and the whole image looks more like a cartoon than a photograph. 

My collage of the two of them was made by me freezing the films and grabbing the images. It's blurry on the right, but that's what the film shows, and I consider it more authentic than the cartoonish one above. 

So, that settles that, but we need to ask ourselves whether there is any chance that it is the same guy wearing the same clothes. And the answer, of course, is no. On the left, the guy is wearing a plaid shirt that is buttoned except for the top button, while on the right, the shirt or sweater or whatever it is the guy is wearing is gaped open exposing a white undershirt, and the shirt pattern is not plaid but rather geometric or blocked, meaning that it consists of large blocks or swaths of color. There is no equating these two. They are miles apart. 

And when you watch the respective clips, you see different action. In Hughes, the guy starts from over at the east wall, and he walks to the center. In, the unsourced footage, he is already at the center. And in the unsourced footage, it starts with him severely turned to the right and with his hand on his hip and his elbow bent about 90 degrees. But, try to find this frame in Hughes.  

If I start timing the Hughes clip from the time he gets to the center, it lasts about 4 seconds, in contrast to the unsourced footage which lasts 6 seconds. You can't do a tit for tat between the two films to confirm that it's the same thing, but why bother when they're not even dressed the same?

And frankly, I can show it using the cartoon version, just to appease the bloodied. Here. Happy? 

The bottom line is that they are NOT the same guy, and the blood-soaked bastards who say they are are just showing their true colors- which is blood red- when they try to say it. They are obviously dressed completely differently, and it is just more wild, weird, wacky JFK stuff that the the bloodied claim in their hopeless effort to defend the official story of the JFK assassination.  Say no to the insanity, then, spit in their eyes.