Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Hey Backass! Where is the better copy of the Martin film? If you don't like the one that I used, where's yours? Provide the link. And if you don't have one, why the hell are you criticizing? 

Now, my point was that the 6 second clip of Lovelady milling around outside the TSBD does not occur in the Martin film. It does not correlate with the Hughes film. And I refuse to believe that somebody took a scissor to the Martin film and cut out the 6 second clip of Lovelady so that it could be used elsewhere. 

So, the 6 second clip of Lovelady is NOT from the Martin film. They say that it is, but they are lying. And that's why I refer to it as unsourced footage because that is what it is.

What I put up IS the whole Martin film. There's nothing else to it. It's just a lie that Jack Martin shot it. It isn't even consistent in quality with Jack Martin's film. 

So forget it, you proscenium-stuffed and blood-soaked Kennedy-killer. It isn't from Martin. 

Backass put up this dual gif from Robin Unger showing the matching Lovelady clips from the unsourced Lovelady clip and the one from Hughes. 

And I'm glad he did because I was just about to get to it. In fact, I'll have a lot to say about it. Know that in Hughes, the screen time of that guy on the right was much longer. They left it out in the above collage, and it's got some very revealing features. I'll give you a preview: I am going to provide evidence that Lovelady figure wasn't there; he was implanted into the film. And the same is true of the other one as well. In other words, these guys are implanted just as Lovelady in the squad room was. 

But, in the meantime, remember, they weren't Lovelady, and they weren't even the same impostor. X-rays don't lie.