You're on your own on this one, Backass. That's because bpunk has Oswald on the 6th floor locking and loading and pumping rounds into Kennedy. And that means he can't have the Dallas Police holding wee hour meetings to plot how to frame Oswald for taking a bus and cab. That would make them bad guys, and it would make Oswald the victim. But, bpunk, being an Oswald accuser, can't go that route. So, you're on your own.
But, you don't actually have anything, Backass. You have no idea who could have picked Oswald up in Dealey Plaza. You've never claimed to know. You've never proffered a name. You have no idea how such a thing could have been arranged. And not having thought about it until I pressed you on it, you finally said that it wasn't arranged; that whomever it was just surprised him and said: "Get in the fuckin' car, Oswald!" I believe those were your exact words.
Now, I find it a bit strange that anyone would yell out something like that in Dealey Plaza minutes after the Kennedy assassination when the place was swarming with cops. I also have to wonder how the driver knew that Oswald would be outside and in ear shot if nothing was arranged.
And I guess people are different because if somebody unexpectedly yelled at me, "Get in the fuckin' car, Cinque!" I wouldn't actually do it.
You don't think much of Oswald, do you, Backass? It shows. You have NEVER been a defender of Lee Harvey Oswald.
You have never stipulated who picked Oswald up. You have never supported the Roger Craig story. So, unlike others, you can't cling to that. You have never provided any possibilities. You have never offered a reason why Oswald would want to be picked up or why anyone would want to pick him up. He traveled back to his room from work by bus presumably all the time. It was his routine, wasn't it? How else could he get home? He had no car. He wasn't used to anyone driving him home. He didn't have some special friend at the TSBD who drove him home every day after work. If such an arrangement existed, we'd have heard about it. And since he had no plans of killing Kennedy that day, he presumably expected to do exactly as he normally did.
What do you have for evidence for this pickup that you say happened is nothing. Absolutely nothing.
So, it's a story with no beginning because "Get in the fuckin' car, Oswald" isn't very persuasive. And it has no middle because you don't even say where Oswald was taken. And it has no end because you don't even relate it to how Oswald got to the theater. In other words, in terms of content, you have nothing. What you provide is: zero. All you have is an abstract idea.
In fact, you aren't even interested in pursuing it. What you are all about is what you think Oswald didn't do, not what he did.
But, the question is: Why do you expect anyone else to take your abstract ideas seriously? An idea without any particulars amounts to nothing. How far do you think it would get you in court? Lawyers know that if they are going to suggest an alternate theory for a crime, they had better come up with something concrete.
It's a real world out there, Backass; and it was a real world in 1963. That means that you can't say that something happened unless you've got something concrete to back it up. In reality, you are disputing the bus and cab rides and replacing them with nothing.
What you don't realize is that the problems you see with the bus and cab rides don't lend support to what you are claiming. You don't think Oswald rode the bus and cab? It doesn't mean that he was necessarily picked up in Dealey Plaza by a driver he knew. Maybe he hitch-hiked home.
You don't like the credibility of the witnesses involved with the bus and cab rides, but you have no witnesses for what you are claiming. You presumably have your reasons for not jumping on the Roger Craig bandwagon, but what have you got instead? Nothing. Absolutely nothing.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.