Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Mary Bledsoe, batty as she was, was an important witness. She claimed that Oswald was wearing a light brown shirt with buttons missing and with holes in the elbow, particularly the right elbow, which was true of Oswald's arrest  shirt. AND, she also claimed that he wore grey trousers. 

You know who else said Oswald wore grey trousers to work? Oswald. 

So, how did Mary Bledsoe know that? There were no images published of Oswald in his grey slacks. How could there be? He changed out of them before the cameras started flashing. All except the Altgens photo in which we only see his shirt and his t-shirt and not his pants.  

So, how did Mary Bledsoe know that Oswald wore grey pants to work unless she saw him wearing them on the bus? Do you think they told her? That they coached her? Practiced her in saying it? Well, if she was that kind of witness, don't you think they would have gotten someone who was more astute and less ditzy than that batty old woman? 

Who made the decision to go with Mary Bledsoe for the fraud? And do you really think that in the hours after the assassination that they embarked on this elaborate fraud, that they had nothing else to do? They had Oswald admitting that he rode the bus. And, they had Oswald admitting that it was his transfer ticket. So, why wasn't that good enough? Who was going to dispute it? Why the hell would they feel the need to come up with phony witnesses to go with what they already had? Why was it worth it to them to go down that dangerous road? Why was it worth it to them to take all the risk involved with it? They had Oswald admitting that he rode the bus and got a transfer ticket. So, why make anything up?