Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

I am glad to see that on the Oswald Innocence Campaign group page, there is a lot of recognition of these phony movies of Lovelady at the Dallas PD, especially by Richard Hooke. 

Richard Hooke I agree...it's like a procession that was transplanted from a different setting...lemmings following Oswald over a cliff...and the guy, positioned by the table, does not belong there either; its like there are 4 different elements: the procession, the room, the guy at the table, and the clock (trying to tell us it was 2pm); at the appropriate time for Lovelady and Oswald to hook up at the PD...although, I still strongly suspect it never happened; no matter how many versions they come up with

Richard Hooke after Lovelady went to the FBI and told them he was wearing a short sleeve striped shirt when the president was shot they needed some evidence of Lovelady in a longsleeve shirt - so they dropped this figure into the squad room at the CIA photo lab - then they realized his build really was not right either (to have been Doorman) so, as Ralph has shown, they began making different versions of a slimmed down guy at the table (AND THEY HAVE EVEN MODIFIED THIS AS RECENTLY AS 2013)


You can tell that they slimmed that whole frame down on the left. Look how narrow the filing cabinets look. Compare right to left. Do you think that was an accident? They were slimming Lovelady down because they realized he was too muscular to be Lovelady and it was impossible for him to be Doorman. 

Here's something funny. Here's how the original 3 Shots looked from the History Channel, and this is actually in slow-motion. 

Now go to Robin Unger's website and watch the gif that he put up. It's similar except that it's shorter and lightening fast. The glimpse you get of Lovelady is so short, it's like 100th of a second. It's just a flash and he's gone. It's nothing like the long slow look we get of him here. From beginning to end, the Lovelady clip is 2 seconds. 

http://quaneeri2.blogspot.com/?zx=604527c6a68f324c

I'm telling you that baby really flies by in the version Unger put up. It's almost faster than the eye can see. But, I did keep my trusty finger on the Print Screen button, and after several tries, I caught a good screen capture of it, and here it is:

That is from Robin Unger's site, and I must say that Lovelady doesn't look slimmed down at all. He looks pretty darn buff, doesn't he? So, what it means is that they dealt with the problem of his excess muscularity in this case just by speeding it up. That's all they did was go with lightening speed.

So, what are we looking at here in the way of a difference? The Unger frame is definitely darker. Lovelady is darker, the wall is darker, the whole thing is darker. But, if there is any difference in the size of Lovelady, it is very slight and practically nothing. They simply dealt with the problem using speed. 

But remember that there are many many versions of this film, and some of them rely on slimming Lovelady down, and sometimes quite a lot. We've got the Don Knotts version:

Did they, or did they not slim him down? Should we assume that this is innocent? Shall we make excuses for it? Shall we assume they faked a bus ride and a cab ride for Oswald but that this is legit? That this is OK?  

Nobody was even talking about this until the 1970s. Mrs. Lovelady never mentioned it to Harold Weisberg in 1967. It wasn't on the radar. And this particular version did not show up until 2009 that we know of, which means that the slenderized version on the left was done after 2009. The cover-up of the JFK assassination goes on even as we speak.