Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Big, long rant by the Idiot Backes, and very little of it is even worthy of comment. And as usual, he mis-stated one of my positions:

I do not maintain that they used the 1964 image of Lovelady to alter the face of Doorman. They used the image of him from the 1950s. The exact year is in question. It's an image that did not surface at all at the time of the assassination. It didn't surface publicly until the HSCA released it in the late 1970s. They ascribed the year of it as "1959", but I have a strong suspicion that it was earlier than that, judging by his age in the picture.

That's the image they used, Backes. I should point out that the HSCA had it flipped, that is, right-to-left flipped- the mirror image. But, I unflipped it. I estimate the year to be 1957.

Then, the Idiot Backes continues to insist that the Fritz Notes are chronological.

How can they be chronological when it has "to 1st floor had lunch" AFTER the encounter with Truly and Baker? Oswald did not go to the domino room to eat lunch after the assassination. He did it before the assassination at a time when Junior Jarmon and Harold Norman were milling about. Oswald remembered the name "Junior". He recalled Harold Norman as a "short negro". Those two men were indeed together. There were there at that time. And they wound up watching the motorcade together from the 5th floor window.

So clearly, the Fritz notes are NOT chronological.

Backes says the OIC is on its deathbed, but we just acquired two new professors as senior members in the last two weeks. I'd say it's more like Backes' opposition to the OIC is on its deathbed.