Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Backes: There was only one arrow that Lovelady drew.  And it points towards "Doorman."

Cinque: Great! Then I'd like to see it. Do you mind showing me that arrow? Because the only arrow I can find pointing to Doorman is the one that everyone agrees was drawn by Buell Frazier.

Backes:   Cinque is a man who thinks the Dallas Police were not police at all, and were in fact a film studio!

Cinque: No, Backes; the phony films were made later. There was no fake films made on 11/22/63 at the Dallas PD or anywhere else. But YOU are the one who thinks the Dallas Police were in the scriptwriting business on 11/22/63, concocting a phony bus ride and phony cab ride for Oswald. It would have been impossible for them to do that and get away with it, but that's what you said they did. Idiot. 

Backes: A man who thinks it’s impossible for people from 19 different countries to look at the same blog, and decided to call Bpete “Mr. 19."

Cinque: Well, I figured that "Lance Uppercut" was just bpete trying to make a fresh start, but thanks for confirming it. 

Backes: A man who did not take into account the personal dimensions of Lovelady, meaning his height and weight.  Cinque looks shorter than Lovelady.  But, this height issue was not addressed. 

Cinque: I stood on my toes, and that brought me up to Lovelady's height. 

Backes:  A man who thinks the African-American’s arm going up is Lovelady’s arm going down, despite realizing that this would make Lovelady’s arm more than 10 feet long.  He knows that no human arm is that long, he knows an arm doesn’t get thicker shoulder to elbow and then elbow to wrist, yet this one does if you think it’s Lovelady’s going down.  A Human arm is thickest near the shoulder and it gets thiner as one goes to the wrist.  Here the opposite occurs.  If you accept that its an arm going up then it makes sense.   

Cinque: No. It's Oswald's arm, and Roy Lewis was out of view to Altgens; his profile picture having been inserted into the Altgens photo from the Willis frame. And with that, there is no need for any 10 foot arms. But you, insane idiot that you are, think you have the right to assume that this is a man's sleeve rolled up:

What a moron! Show me one other image from the history of photography in which a man's rolled up sleeve looks as neat and tidy and squared-off as what we are seeing there. Show me one other image from the entire history of photography in which a man's skin registers the exact same tone and color as his rolled up sleeve. It's like he wore a shirt that day identical with his skin color: the same shade, the same pattern, the same everything. Show me another picture from the entire history of photography in which a man's arm showed up in a picture and no other part of him. Well??????????????????????????  You blithering idiot! You sheep-shit for brains moron! 

You are so presumptuous about all these things! You are so stupid! But, keep it up, Backes, because this is playing out just my way.