No, Backes. That statement is of NO evidentiary value. You hear me? I said none. By itself, it means nothing. I have no more respect for Richard E. Sprague than I have for you, which is to say, none.
And the only thing bpete busted is his own reputation. That mark on the forearm of Black Hole Man exists on every version of CE 369 that I have so far seen, including the one from history-matters.com.
That little line on BH Man's forearm is Lovelady's arrow, and not you, nor bpete, nor Robin Unger, nor anyone else has found any other for him, and he definitely drew one. So, you and your proscenium arches can head to Capitol and examine the original in search of an alternate arrow for Lovelady. Until you proffer one, this one stands as the only game in town. You got that?
And no, what my Altgens recreation proved is that the face of Roy Lewis in the Altgens photo is not legit; it was imposed into the photograph. That's what I proved- since Doorman's arm could never reach in front of his neck.
Backes, you are choosing to ignore photographic alteration as an explanation for some of what we see in the Altgens photo. You think the bad guys engaged in making up phony bus rides, phony cab rides, phony treks to the tracks, and voluminous and detailed phony testimonies, but the one thing they did not do, according to you, is alter any photographs. All the JFK assassination photographs and films are as pure as the driven snow, according to you. You despicable phony! You are no friend to John Kennedy. And you're certainly no friend to Lee Oswald.
Listen, you demented slob: They altered the Altgens photo and most of the films. You can deny it, but it's only because you're evil and stupid. You're disgusting.
They whited out Ob Man's face, and they blackened out BH Man's face. And I proved that in Dealey Plaza as well, and I mean both of them. Look right above. What do you see? A white blob and a black hole.
I figure my letter to Professor Gerald McKnight reached his office today, although I don't know when he will get to read it.
I can't lose, Backes. If he doesn't respond, for whatever reason, I'll be no worse off than before. But, if he does respond, you're not going to like what follows. That's not a threat; it's a promise.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.