Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Backes, why don't you just admit that you were wrong? After all, you were, and you're not going to get away with it. 

This is what you wrote:

You plainly said that the long report mentioning the red and white vertical striped shirt and the short report mentioning the red and white vertical striped shirt were enclosures within ONE LETTER from Hoover to Rankin. But, that wasn't quite true, was it? 

So, it was a different report, right? And it was only "referenced" not "enclosed." So, you are completely and totally full of shit, aren't you? 

Then, for some reason, you reference page 5 of Gemberling's 300 page report, except it wasn't by Gemberling but by Neeley, Rice, and Peggs. 

And what are you referencing that Mike Shapiro stuff again for? What we were talking about was the number of times that the FBI put in writing that Lovelady said he wore a red and white vertical striped shirt and blue jeans. That's what we were talking about. That's what this particular argument is all about. So, don't try to change the fucking subject, dipshit. 

And, what that says is that the Altgens photo was first wired to AP headquarters in New York and then subsequently to other AP offices around the country. If they meant to say that it was wired to the whole world, they would have said that it was wired to the whole world.

Then you say:

Why'd they wait until Saturday to publish the Altgens photo, moe-foe? I'll tell you why. It's because they didn't get it at 1:03 pm on Friday as you have been falsely alleging for years.  And we're supposed to believe that the Benton Harbors News-Palladium could get the Altgens photo published on Friday but the Washington Post, with all its vast resources and connections, couldn't? 

Guess what, Shit-for-brains? The same people who can fake bus rides and cab rides and whole persons like Mary Bledsoe can also fake newspapers. 

And if you want to believe bull shit claims of the FBI about what Lovelady said, go ahead. I prefer to believe Lovelady. And as of April 7, 1964, he was graphically demonstrating that he was Black Hole Man in the Altgens photo. 

   

That's the only other mark on that photo besides the large arrow that Frazier drew; therefore, it must be Lovelady's arrow. And no, contrary to urban legend, he actually had a face. It's impossible for a man to shade-to-black his entire face with his hands.  It's impossible for a man to shade-to-black his entire face with his hands.  It's impossible for a man to shade-to-black his entire face with his hands. 

And, James Richards was right, and you are wrong. This is NOT Thomas Beckham:

The HSCA got it wrong, and even Mary Ferrell was hedging about it:

They didn't distinguish anyone else that way. This was Beckham:

Different guy, Asshole. The other guy was Rogue Dalton Garcia, just as James Richards said. 

You made a mistake! You were wrong! Just as you were wrong here:

The ways in which that is ridiculous and absurd are too numerous for me to even get started. IDIOT.