Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

My point about Doug Horne was that once you recognize that "a" JFK film was altered, like the Zapruder film, which millions recognize as being altered, then you can't close your mind to other JFK films being altered. Because: if they would alter one, then surely they would alter others. 

But, my claim that the Lovelady films were all fabricated is based on the observable fact the Lovelady figures therein do not look like known images of him, and they do not look like each other. 

A man is a unique individual, and his images have to be consistent with himself. These disparate images are not consistent with Lovelady, and they are not consistent with each other.  And that is what screams fraud about this whole thing. It is much more glaring evidence of fraud than the testimonies of McWatters, Whaley, and Bledsoe.