Thursday, September 12, 2013

Backes: I cannot over stress this enough.  He admitted, A-D-M-T-T-E-D, HE, AND HE ALONE CREATES FAKE PHOTOGRAPHIC "EVIDENCE" AS IF HE IS DISCOVERING PHOTOGRAPHIC FAKERY. "It" occurs only when Cinque farts around with the digital film and in his inept attempts to get a still frame.

Cinque: No, Backes. All I do is start the film and stop it. And what I'm seeing is a difference in the way the Lovelady figure is affected, as compared to the other figures in the film.

Backes: What this means is that he actually thinks he's reverse engineering a Youtube.com version of a real film and that he can create a single, real, film frame.  But he cannot.  It will never, ever work.  And he presents this as "evidence," as something factual, something real.  He thinks each and every individual film frame of JFK assassination and assassination related films are scanned, one frame at a time, and that all of the single, individual film frames of the Martin film, and the Charles Buck film and other films were scanned just like the Zapruder film was.  And this is not the case.  He thinks he can stop any JFK assassination related film online, hit pause, or whatever the hell it is that he does and that he can create a single film frame that will be an exact match for an individual film frame from the camera original film.  It doesn't work that way.

Cinque: I never said it corresponded to an individual frame of the movie. I said that when I stopped the film that the figure showed signs of running or bleeding of the colors. And the extent of it varies. Some stops produce very little distortion, while other stops produce a lot of distortion. But, the crucial thing is that it only happens to the Lovelady figure. 

And yes, I am talking about online, digital versions of the films. So what? We're talking about an effect that is UNIQUE to the Lovelady figure, and it's that uniqueness that makes it significant.

Backes: It only happens to Lovelady when you are fucking about, Cinque.

Cinque: I'm just starting and stopping the film; that's all I'm doing. And I am not the only one who has observed the effect. Richard Hooke has gotten some impressive bleeds too, and he's posted them. 

This is the image we have demonstrating the effect on the Lovelady page of the OIC site. 




Do you, or do you not, see how distorted his hair looks? That's what I am talking about, and it only happens to him, Lovelady. No one else. That means something. He wasn't there. 

I drew that arrow in because I wanted you to see what direction that cop in back is walking. You see where the cop is. You see where Lovelady is. How is the cop supposed to get by him?

There is a thing in life called "personal space". Nobody would be comfortable in that situation. The cop wouldn't be comfortable, and Lovelady wouldn't be comfortable. And Lovelady would have gotten up and skidaddled out of there long before it got that cramped. It is ridiculous to think that he would have just sat there, like a lump on a log, and force a procession of cops to move around him. He'd have gotten up and moved aside. 

He wasn't there. You hear me, Backes? I can say it louder because I know you're hard of hearing. You don't even use your ears because you don't listen. HE WASN'T THERE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!







No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.