I presume somebody has gotten the word to Jim Bookhout, informing him about what is going on. And, if he's got photos of his tall father, he could send them to me right now. Jim, if you're reading this, Jim, my email is: firstname.lastname@example.org.
Jim, if your father really was tall, then obviously, he could not have been the Garage Shooter of Lee Harvey Oswald. So, if you provide an indisputable image of him, meaning one that shows no sign of alteration and where his facial features match the known images of him from SMU, where I have no doubt that it's him, and if he is obviously tall, then that will settle it.
Not only will that settle it, it is the only thing that will settle it. Nobody's unproven claims and roundabout excuses matter one little bit.
And, I see each passing day that no such image of a tall James Bookhout is being offered to me as confirmation that your father was short, and someone from the FBI lied to me.
In fact, the more days that pass in which I don't get such an image, the more suspicious I am going to be if such an image finally surfaces. There is no excuse for the delay.
What we know is that, officially, there are NO images of James Bookhout from the time of the JFK assassination even though he attended more Oswald interrogations than anyone except Will Fritz. And, we also know that there are no images of him from after the assassination for the rest of his life, and that includes his obituary, which contained no image of him. That's 46 years, from 1963 to 2009. It's a long time to go without having your picture taken.
So, if you would please provide an untampered photo of your father, which clearly shows his face and his height, I would greatly appreciate it. And after that, if I owe you an apology, you'll get it.