Tuesday, June 3, 2014

I tell you, this image of the woman and the girl from the photograph discovered in 2013 increasingly bothers me. 



So, that's the whole image, and here's the crop of the woman and girl:


So, the girl is essentially sitting, but what is she sitting on? It can only be the arm of the woman, right? And let me point out where the girl's center of gravity is:






That X shows you the direction that that girl's weight is falling back to Earth. There has to be support under that X to keep her from falling. But, how could that woman's arm reach that far down? Let's say the girl is sitting on the woman's forearm. Bend your own elbow to make a sitting platform for a child. How low does it go? Here's me doing it:




I've got my forearm horizontal- because we do want to provide a flat surface for the kid to sit on, right? I can't make my upper arm any longer. Unless I bend my knees or something, that kid is going to be sitting up high as long as I'm standing straight, as that woman is. 

What's the alternative? To straighten my arm and just cock my wrist and have the kid sit in the palm of my hand?



Wait a second! Get the Hell out of here! There is no way that girl was sitting in the palm of that woman's hand. 



That girl is too low to be sitting on the woman's forearm, and she couldn't possibly be sitting on the woman's hand. It really looks like the girl is sitting on a step or a stoop or even a chair. Obviously, she is not doing it in that setting. But, I mentioned the possibility of the woman wearing some kind of suspension device for carrying children, such as this.




They are getting increasingly popular in the US. My son and his wife have one for my grandson, and yes, Granddad (that's what I go by, not Grandpa) uses it himself. I don't know how available they were in the 1960s, but in some parts of the world, they've been around for millennia, although much more simplified. 

So, if the woman is wearing a child-carrying sling, that would explain how she's holding the girl, that is, she's not; rather, the girl is suspended from her. 

That idea is still on the table, and I like it a lot better than saying the woman was supporting the girl with just her left arm. But, that is a small, frail woman there, and the girl is no baby. Even if the woman's left arm was off the hook, it's still a lot of weight to be hanging from your left side. So, what would you do? You'd lean the opposite way, to your right side, to get a counterbalance going. 



This is a young Peruvian mother with a very simple sling. The baby's weight is perched on her left side so her tendency is to lean right to get the counterbalance.




In the above case, the weight is suspended from the front, so the mother leans back. Counterbalance.

In the following case, the weight is in back, so the mother leans forward. Counterbalance.



And here's one more. Again, the  young woman is not standing straight. She is leaning slightly in the opposite direction that the weight is pulling.



But when we look at the Woman and Girl in question, we don't see any compensation at all. 


It's like she is supporting all that weight effortlessly, as though the girl is as light as a feather. The woman isn't straining; she isn't struggling. Is she Superwoman? 

I'm increasingly wondering if it's just a bogus image. And we know it's been photoshopped. You can't tell me that mother and daughter just happened to wear clothes that were the exact same shade of pink. I don't give a Kleep or a Klopp for that idea.  

And there is something behind the girl's neck. What is it? I don't know. But, the front part of it is pink like the dress, and the back part of it is white like the bonnet? But, that can't be legit. That's nothing but sloppy colorizing. 



So, is it possible that they added them to the picture, perhaps for the sake of getting another person who was waving?


Because if you took them out, you don't have a whole lot of waving going on, and it might seem a little lackluster. Remember this wasn't just President and First Lady, this was Jack and Jackie, the hottest celebrity couple on the planet. By the way, the woman and the baby who are next to them score 100% for bio-mechanical integrity and legitimacy. No worries about what they're doing whatsoever. They check out fine.  

Anyway, the woman and the girl just don't compute. They don't add up. This was an image that was supposedly discovered in 2013. I started talking about the illegitimacy and impossibility of the Altgens mother supposedly holding up the Altgens boy in 2011. Was this woman and girl done in response to that? 



I don't know, but both are hugely problematic to those with a bent towards human bio-physics. 










No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.