Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Robin Unger refuses to explain what he meant with this collage. Or at least, he is unwilling to clarify what he meant in light of my questions. So, I'll do it myself. 

Unger stacked those photos, not me. So above, there is Tina Towner standing where she stood when she filmed, and across the street there are two people in front of the Obelisk. Now, I don't assume Robin alleges that those two people aren't there. Then, he has an inset of the 2nd Fedora Man from Altgens in the lower right corner. And I believe he's raising a problem with that guy: alleging that he SEEMS to be back on the sidewalk in front of the decorative facade of the building but he was really in front of the Obelisk. And then below, he shows the 2nd Fedora Man from Towner in front of the Obelisk. Ipso facto: Unger is saying that the 2nd Fedora Man from Towner was the 2nd Fedora Man from Altgens, but the one who shows the real location is the Towner guy. 

And that's why I say it is polar-opposite to Backes who denies that the 2nd Fedora Man in Towner was really where he appears to be:

You said the man isn't standing in front of the white column, Backass. It is a declarative statement, you stupid mudder-rucker. 

This is unbelievable. These two morons are making polar-opposite assertions but are either too stupid to recognize it or too dishonest to admit it. Then Backes says this:

I think? So, you don't think it then, right? So, you don't think the guy is in front of the white column, right? Well, Robin and I think he was. 

And look at the full statement. It means what it says. 

So, I think that equating the man in front of the column in Towner with the man in front of facade in Altgens is STUPID CRAP. Yes, I do. But, that must mean that you don't think it's STUPID CRAP. So, you must think it's true, that these two are the same man:

You've said it repeatedly that you think they are the same man, Backes. And Unger also thinks they are the same man. But, your claim is that the guy on the left only seems to be there. You said he "was no more in front of the column, etc." But Unger says foreshortening causes objects at Houston and Elm to appear the same size and distance as people on the north side of Elm. So, he is denying the authenticity of the guy on the right, while you are denying the authenticity of the guy on the left. 

And I think you are both the dumbest fucks there ever was.