Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

I have been saying that in the Jackson photo, the weird handcuff on Oswald, besides being weird, is also too far forward. It's supposed to be back on his wrist, but it's up on his hand. 

Don't you think that's a bit much? Also, I was reminded that besides the Beers photo and the Jackson photo, there is one more glittering posing shot of the trio, and here is how it shows it:

Notice that the handcuff doesn't look so weird and it's back on his wrist where it belongs. But, this was before Oswald got shot, in which there was no area of trauma to cover up. 

This is not back on the wrist:

There is no way you can construe that into being back on the wrist.