First, let's look at confirming images of Steve.
BUT, WAIT! LOOK AT THE ABOVE PICTURE! IT'S STRIKINGLY SIMILAR TO THE BALD ONE THAT UPPERPUNK USED. SOMEONE MUST HAVE DELIBERATELY FLOODED IT WITH LIGHT TO PRODUCE THE BALD EFFECT.
The lighting is obviously very different between those two photos, and yet, it had to be exactly the same at the time at the location. And don't anybody try to tell me that the photographer on the left used a flash because this was a Snooker competition, and it would have been very distracting to the players. They would never have allowed it.
But, regardless, we know there is no flooding of light on top of Lovelady's head in the FBI photo or in the Mark Lane photo, and therefore, there is no analogy to the highly suspicious one of Steve Davis.
So, the whole argument fails on that alone. But, it is extremely disturbing that Lance Upperpunk would submit this photo:
There is no reason to believe it's real. What they did, I believe, is look for an example that was in the ballpark of what they wanted, and then they exaggerated it by altering the light- flooding the top of his head with light.
So, now we can state for the record that photographic fraud was done for the JFK assassination in 2014, which is when the Punk first submitted this photo. You see, these bastards are never finished. His colleague, Pete McMoron submitted this one just a week ago, which has put 6 fingers on Oswald.
That was to explain this freakery:
So now, we can state for the record that photographic fraud took place in the JFK assassination in 2016.