Image of FBI Agent James Bookhout posing as Jack Ruby exposes the con
The JFK case has been blown wide open with irrefutable proof that FBI Agent James Bookhout was the real shooter of Lee Harvey Oswald.
The man in white above is supposed to be Jack Ruby, but he is definitely NOT Jack Ruby. This guy's face is much rounder; his nose is much narrower; his ears are different from Ruby's; and he is simply not Jack Ruby. We have known for weeks that he isn't Jack Ruby but that he was impersonating Jack Ruby, playing the part of Jack Ruby on 11/24/63. But, who was he? Now we know: He was FBI Special Agent James W. Bookhout, the man who attended more Oswald interrogations than anyone except for Captain Will Fritz.
There are zero images of James Bookhout from the JFK assassination, even though he was omnipresent around Oswald. So, how do we know that the man above is James Bookhout? It's from comparing that image to images of James Bookhout when he was a young man, as you'll see.
But first, let's compare him to Jack Ruby. Note how much rounder his face and head were compared to Jack Ruby. James Bookhout had a head like Charlie Brown from the Peanuts comic. Note also that James Bookhout had a narrower nose and very pinched nostrils compared to Jack Ruby. I don't know how he could run a race without breathing through his mouth.
The man on the right above is FBI Agent James Bookhout! He is the one who got filmed in the so-called live footage of Ruby shooting Oswald.
A gang of cops started swarming him immediately after the shooting, while another set were holding the real Jack Ruby somewhere, waiting to make the switch.
This is Ruby being processed after his arrest.
That is definitely James Bookhout, and now, we shall compare him to his youthful images. Note that on the left below, they gave him phony Drag Queen eye brows. His eye brows weren't like that.
Using the mirror image puts the angle into proper perspective, and then you really see the match.
That is not only the same face, with the same narrow nose and pinched nostrils, the same full checks, the same depth of eyes, etc., it is the same postural arrangement. The holding position of the head, the angle of it, and the whole postural balance are exactly the same. It's the same man. There can't be any doubt about it. There can't be any greater likeness than that over the span of time involved, which was 26 years. For a 26 year time span, that is a greater preservation of likeness than most people experience.
If you are older, as I am, do you look that much like your images from 26 years ago?
The comparison below uses an image of Bookhout from several years earlier.
Why do we have to use youthful images of him? Because it's all we have, and it's no accident. They made sure of it. Officially, there are NO images of James Bookhout from the JFK assassination. None! Zero! And that's true even though Bookhout followed Oswald around non-stop for two days. The only person who attended more Oswald interrogations than James Bookhout was the chief interrogator, Captain Will Fritz. That's how omnipresent Bookhout was. Yet, there are no images of him; none at all.
Larry Rivera, the Chairman of the Oswald Innocence Campaign Chairman, has made a gif of Young Bookhout with the Older Bookhout. Notice how the face of Young Bookhout morphs into that of the older Bookhout without any displacement whatsoever. It's seamless. This is a time-warp in the life of one man.
All along I asked myself: Why did they need a Ruby impostor at the Dallas PD when they had the real Ruby? The answer is that the real Ruby didn't do it; he was just a patsy, like Oswald himself. It was a bait and switch. They replaced the real shooter with Ruby and than tried to vanish the other guy, but unfortunately for them, one picture of him got taken. This one below. You might say it fell through the cracks.
So, why did Jack Ruby go along with it if he didn't shoot Oswald? Jack Ruby wasn't well in the head. His mind wasn't right. You only have to read his testimony to know that. And, he kept saying over and over that he had no memory of shooting Oswald, that he remembered going to the jail and then being swarmed by cops, but he remembered nothing in-between. He kept saying that it was all a "blur."
Ruby even said that when Dallas Police pushed him down to the ground that he responded by saying, "What are you doing? I'm Jack Ruby. You know me." And I don't know where that happened because the real Ruby was not in the garage during the televised event.
And by the way, there are a lot of parallels between Jack Ruby and Sirhan Sirhan. Neither one of them had any memory of doing any shooting. Were they both MK-ULTRA subjects? MK-ULTRA was the CIA's mind control program, started in the 1950s. It's a riveting possibility.
And then consider what happened after the shooting. "Ruby" (AKA Bookhout) dove into the swarm of police in front of him. And what did they do? Did they go to handcuff him as police would normally do? No! Instead, they herded him into the building without stopping to handcuff him. Have you ever heard of police doing that before or since? They herded him into the building, like a herd of penguins.
The whole purpose of that was to keep Bookhout under cover so that his face would not be seen.
They weren't struggling with him. They were working as a team; keeping him concealed until they got him out of camera range.
I'm sure they wished they could have made Bookhout disappear as soon as they wrestled him inside. But, they were stuck with him until they could get him out of the building, and one picture of him got taken. And that was tough luck- for them.
James Bookhout is definitely the one who pulled off the Oswald shooting. He did it in front of world cameras and television audiences. Then, the cops had to wrestle him into the building without exposing his face- and they understood full-well the necessity of that. It's because he was James Bookhout.
In a situation like this, Police, from anywhere in the world, would do the same thing: get the man in handcuffs. You don't take him anywhere until he's cuffed. Police will always do that. But here, instead, they danced him into the building without cuffing him? Ridiculous! Police don't do that! They never do that. So, why did they do it here?
They did it here because they couldn't let the world see that he was really James Bookhout, not Jack Ruby. They had to keep him concealed. If they had cuffed him, then they would have had to stand him up, and there would have been no excuse not to expose him to the cameras. Once a man is cuffed, the fight is over. The man is neutralized. He's pacified. The fight is taken out of him. You stand him up, and everybody steps aside. They couldn't do that here.
What happened once they got through the door of the jail office? I doubt that anyone yelled, "Cut!" but they might as well have. They had to continue the ruse for a while, until they could get him out of there. But, before they could vanish him, this photo got taken. Think about how strange it is: cops posing with a murderer. Did someone say "Cheese"? Apparently not, since no one is smiling.
But, you have to admit that going from this:
to "Everybody say cheese" in about a minute is pretty weird.
They were struggling in that garage in wild pandemonium. The reporter even used the word "pandemonium." And then they were posing for a picture a minute or two later? It's bizarre. How it got taken, who took it, and how it wound up in a film compilation, I do not yet know. The film compilation is the 1993 retrospective, The Killing of Lee Harvey Oswald, which is available on Youtube. That's where we found it, and we are awfully lucky that we did. It was made by the same producer who made the original "live" footage of "Ruby" shooting Oswald. His name was Frederick Rheinstein.
One last point, and it may be a shocker: I am not certain that Bookhout inflicted any damage to Oswald. I think there is a very good chance that it was entirely a ruse in which Bookhout fired a blank and Oswald was killed later. But, I won't go into that now. This is enough to present now, that Jack Ruby was innocent, and James Bookhout was the real garage shooter of Lee Harvey Oswald.
On the left below is Bookhout. At the time he was filing into Captain Fritz' office to participate in the Saturday, November 23 interrogation of Oswald at 6:30 PM, along with Fritz, Secret Service Inspector Thomas Kelley, and several detectives. It's definitely him, Bookhout, and there is no one else it could be. Notice the excellent comparison to the Garage Shooter.
I realize that the man on the right seems to have longer hair, but I suspect that, one way or another, that was faked. You can see that Bookhout's hair wasn't that long in back, but neither was Ruby's. So, that doesn't work for either one of them. It was 1963; pre-Beatles; and men didn't wear their hair that long, and certainly not middle-aged men and older. Also, if you look closely at Bookhout's right ear, you see that it looks unusual, like there was a q-tip stuck or something stuck to it. That has to be photographic flim-flam that was done precisely to prevent anyone from making a favorable comparison of the ears. I said at the start that there are no images of Bookhout from the assassination, and that's true, meaning: officially, there aren't any. This one fell through the cracks. It is definitely James Bookhout.
This discovery is big. It is staggering. It is breathtaking. It blows apart the whole JFK assassination story. If a U.S. government agent shot or pretended to shoot Lee Harvey Oswald, then it follows that U.S. government agents must have shot JFK. That follows like night follows day. What comes next I don't know, but something big has got to happen now.
I have made a video version of this presentation which is now up on Youtube. Please watch it and share it with everyone you know.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o4AtBv2cmvI&feature=youtu.be
And, please visit and talk-up the website of the Oswald Innocence Campaign:
www.oswald-innocent.com
Lee Harvey Oswald was framed and innocent. He was standing in the doorway of the Texas Book Depository during the shooting.
And likewise, Jack Ruby was framed and innocent. He, like Oswald, was just a patsy. NEITHER OF THEM SHOT ANYBODY. The difference between them was that Ruby was mentally deranged but Oswald wasn't.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.