Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Backes, you stupid fool, the images that Greg Burnham protested weren't from Conspiracy World. I was comparing two images, and they were both from ROBIN UNGER. He posted them. They were supposed to be good images from the good, better, best film.

They are from two close frames from the Towner film, and I mean the good version of it. I think it's offered by the Sixth Floor Museum. I don't recall the name of it, but these are both from it, the highest quality version of the Towner film. 

That's what I wanted to talk about, why the baby looks so deformed in the frame on the right. You can't tell me that that's the proper shape for an infant, can you? And why is there a dark veil across the mother's face on the right? If there is an explanation for it, I want to know what it is. Robin Unger has provided one.

So, if you think this involved an "unscrupulous documentary" then you'll have to find out from Robin Unger where it came from. Supposedly, these were not the poorest quality images but the best ones.  I don't think they used piss-poor quality images. Is that what you think Robin Unger did? They came from him, Asshole. Understand? They came from him. They came from him. They ushered from Unger!

But, for some reason, in another frame close the original that he posted, the baby is shaped more like a seahorse than a child. 

I want to know, Backes: Why should a nearby frame have the baby looking more like a seahorse than a human infant? It is distortion, and I want it explained. It is the only issue I raised on Greg Burnham's forum. And if you think I'm scrawny, wait until we meet, mo-fo.