Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Backes' poll is over, and 3 people participated. They were: bpete, Klip Klop, and Mark O'Blase'. They all voted Backes' way, but don't assume it means they actually agree with him. They voted for him because it was a way of voting against me. That's all they were trying to do. And the whole thing was a devil's gambit. 

The Warren Commission didn't have to make up a story about what Shelley and Lovelady were doing BEFORE they supposedly saw Vicky Adams. They could have been doing anything before they supposedly saw Vicky Adams. They could have just hung around outside a while. And they could have come in through the front door- there was no need to go around to the back. And whatever Backes thinks Shelley and Lovelady were actually doing before they supposedly saw Vicky, that would have worked too. Call it X. "We did X, and then we saw Vicky." 

Perhaps Backes thinks they didn't do anything except go back inside after the shooting. So you say, "We went back inside right away. We were guarding the freight elevator, as Mr. Truly told us to do. Then, after a while, Vicky came down the stairs." 

What do you need a trek to the tracks for? What do you need a back door entry for? Why make all that up? 

The issue is not whether the trek to the tracks was real. That's irrelevant. What matters is whether Shelley and Lovelady's encounter with Vicky Adams was real. Their testimonies say it was. Vicky said it wasn't. And Sylvia Styles said it wasn't. So, that's where it stands, and the trek to the tracks has nothing to do with it. 

You're stupid, Backes. And your friends are stupid. You're like the Three Stooges, except there are four of you.