Thursday, August 7, 2014
Hey Unger! You put the image on the left up on Education Forum. Here it is in its entirety.
So, that's what you put up, Unger, and that's what it shows. And obviously, it is no match to Gorilla Man in Martin, who is supposed to be the same man, Billy Lovelady.
Note: The identification of Gorilla Man as Lovelady is only in recognition of the widespread claim of my opponents that he was Lovelady, a claim which I fiercely deny. This man was NOT Lovelady; he was a Lovelady impostor; and he was NOT there on 11/22/63. But, his image is the one most often used to substantiate and materialize Lovelady on 11/22/63, and that is why I refer to him as Lovelady.
So, what gives, Unger? Admit that it's a fraud. Admit that the whole attempt to depict Lovelady in a plaid shirt was a fraud, one which was attempted multiple times and in multiple ways. You can't hide from your own work, Unger. Time to face facts.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.