Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

I'm not even going to waste my time on bpunk's latest rant. Now, he's leaning on the phony Marguerite, who was not Oswald's biological mother, to substantiate images in the Altgens photo. 
He's also back to claiming that Lovelady drew his arrow right on top of Frazier's- as if he snuck it in, and it went 50 years without being seen until the shit-faced bpunk saw it. Evil and stupid is what bpunk is. 

The Altgens Woman and Boy were definitely not there. I would bet my life on it. He's way high, and she can't possibly be holding him. 

It is physically impossible for her to be holding him, and there was nothing there for him to stand on. It is a phony image, a bogus image. And it was put there not because the guy was Jack Ruby but because of how he's facing. 

Remember that the Altgens alterations were made on 11/22 and Ruby didn't shoot Oswald until 11/24. And, I don't presume the alterers knew that he was going to do that.  They covered him up because he had his back to the President of the United States. They covered him up because he would rather look at Lee Harvey Oswald in the doorway than see the President. We are looking at his back. We are looking at him eyeing Oswald. And that is why the Woman and Boy were inserted. 

And regarding Black Hole Man, he is Lovelady.

And, the only ther authentic picture of Lovelady from 11/22 is the one from the Cough film.

That's it. These are the only two genuine images of Lovelady from 11/22/63:

And, they took out the face of Billy Lovelady on the right because it was the face of Billy Lovelady. 

And Lovelady drew an arrow to that figure to indicate himself in the Altgens photo. 

Every sane person knows that the purpose of having two arrows is to distinguish one from the other. What would be the point of piling two arrows together? Isn't honesty supposed to be a value? How about accurate communication? Does bpunk think that that every soul in the world is as blackened as his? No honest broker, no uncorrupt respondent, no witness in good faith would do what bpunk is suggesting that Lovelady did and Joseph Ball allowed: to obfuscate the truth and commit a deliberate act of deception. 

That is not two arrows on the left. It is one arrow on the left- the arrow of Buell Frazier. And on the right overlying the forearm of Black Hole Man is the arrow of Billy Lovelady which he drew to himself. Most of it is in the black space, which is where Ball told him to draw it. Fortunately for us, it overlapped the flesh-colored forearm slightly. 

bpunk, you are wicked, dastardly, and vile. Punks like you I slap down hard on principle. But in this case, it's more than that; it's personal.