Wednesday, August 13, 2014

Officialdom has it that that spectator was Robert Adams. It's a close call, but I still favor Conein, and I'll tell you why. I see more of the triangular-shaped face with the wide forehead on Conein and the spectator, which I don't see on Adams. I see the larger, wider nose on Adams which departs from the other two. The match of the peri-oral creases and the general tension around the mouth is a much better match between Conein and the spectator. And realize that the tension you hold in your face is a very fixed habit. I'm not saying I would bet the farm on it, but whatever I'd bet, I'd bet on that guy being Lucien Conein.



Then, I have to ask, did they adjust the aspect ratio of that image of Robert Adams? I'm asking because I found another image of him in which his face doesn't look so long and narrow. In fact, it doesn't look long and narrow at all. It looks more round and chubby.


Hmmm. That's quite a difference in the shape of the face, isn't it? But, notice something very important: the exact same way of holding the mouth and exposing the upper teeth. That's a neuromuscular habit. But, why shouldn't it be the same? It's the same guy. But, we don't see it on the spectator.


The spectator is holding his mouth more like Lucien Conein. 

But, I'm still intrigued with this long narrow face on Robert Adams because it is VERY long and VERY narrow. Let's try to find some other pictures of him to see if we can confirm that. 



Nope. Not even close. How could he go from one to the other?




No, no, no. That isn't helping either. Look, let's face it: he wasn't built that way. They're just messing with us. They adjusted the aspect ratio to give him that long narrow face which he didn't have. 


This is a load of crap, folks. That guy on Elm Street was not the fat-faced Robert Adams. He was the triangular-faced Lucien Conein.  

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.