Friday, August 8, 2014

No, Unger; you're being ridiculous. I posed in a plaid shirt, and I posed in a solid shirt. One was to represent Lovelady's and the other Oswald's. I didn't even think that Lovelady wore a plaid shirt but rather a short-sleeved striped one, but there was no point in posing in it since it was completely incompatible with Doorman's. 


That's what I would have worn if I were going to wear a shirt like Lovelady's. But, I wanted to demonstrate that the contrast we see on Doorman's shirt is not plaid. Plaid means horizontal and vertical lines crossing and forming boxes. We see no vertical lines on Doorman's shirt, and even the horizontal markings are too thick and splotchy to correspond to what we see on Gorilla Man.



Note: The identification of Gorilla Man as Lovelady is only in recognition of the widespread claim of my opponents that he was Lovelady, a claim which I fiercely deny. This man was NOT Lovelady; he was a Lovelady impostor; and he was NOT there on 11/22/63. But, his image is the one most often used to substantiate and materialize Lovelady on 11/22/63, and that is why I refer to him as Lovelady. 

The contrast on Doorman's shirt is due to haze and distortion from the enlargement with a little light reflection thrown in. That is what we are seeing. 



As you can see, there was a fine, grainy pattern on Oswald's shirt, and if you look at the upper left quadrant of Doorman's shirt, you see the graininess without any of the splothchiness. 



It is nothing at all like the plaid of the Lovelady impostor. 





So, that settles that. My wearing plaid in some of the pictures was not a concession that Lovelady actually wore plaid. He did not. This is Lovelady on 11/22/63.



Now, getting back to your work, you posted a frame from the Hughes film on Education Forum, and it shows a hell of a lot of distortion in the Lovelady impostor's shirt.



I want to know how and why his shirt got so distorted when it is supposed to be the same shirt worn by Gorilla Man in the Martin film. 



Explain the discrepancy between those two, Unger. It involves your work. 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.