Note: The identification of Gorilla Man as Lovelady is only in recognition of the widespread claim of my opponents that he was Lovelady, a claim which I fiercely deny. This man was NOT Lovelady; he was a Lovelady impostor; and he was NOT there on 11/22/63. But, his image is the one most often used to substantiate and materialize Lovelady on 11/22/63, and that is why I refer to him as Lovelady.
The contrast on Doorman's shirt is due to haze and distortion from the enlargement with a little light reflection thrown in. That is what we are seeing.
As you can see, there was a fine, grainy pattern on Oswald's shirt, and if you look at the upper left quadrant of Doorman's shirt, you see the graininess without any of the splothchiness.
It is nothing at all like the plaid of the Lovelady impostor.
Now, getting back to your work, you posted a frame from the Hughes film on Education Forum, and it shows a hell of a lot of distortion in the Lovelady impostor's shirt.
I want to know how and why his shirt got so distorted when it is supposed to be the same shirt worn by Gorilla Man in the Martin film.
Explain the discrepancy between those two, Unger. It involves your work.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.