Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

I would like you to compare the collar of Gorilla Man with those of Lovelady when he was posing as Doorman.

Note: The identification of Gorilla Man as Lovelady is only in recognition of the widespread claim of my opponents that he was Lovelady, a claim which I fiercely deny. This man was NOT Lovelady; he was a Lovelady impostor; and he was NOT there on 11/22/63. But, his image is the one most often used to substantiate and materialize Lovelady on 11/22/63, and that is why I refer to him as Lovelady. 

Notice that Lovelady, in 1967 and 1976 had his collar folded over, albeit in different ways. But on Gorilla Man, it is not folded over at all. You can see that his shirt was flush with the top of his chest. 

I have put an x there to show you that shirt material went all the way up to the top of his chest. You see the x, right? You see the white line below the x, right? That is fabric there. So, his shirt was NOT splayed open- not even as much as Lovelady did when he posed, which was less than what we see on Doorman. 

So, how could Gorilla Lovelady possibly be Doorman?

Note: The identification of Gorilla Man as Lovelady is only in recognition of the widespread claim of my opponents that he was Lovelady, a claim which I fiercely deny. This man was NOT Lovelady; he was a Lovelady impostor; and he was NOT there on 11/22/63. But, his image is the one most often used to substantiate and materialize Lovelady on 11/22/63, and that is why I refer to him as Lovelady.