Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

It's true what I said that Frazier ruled out Lovelady as Doorman. It's just that he didn't know that he ruled him out. He doesn't realize that it only looks like Doorman is next to the west wall, when, in fact, he is really in the center. 

Nobody in the world knows that better than I do because, as far as I know, I am the only person in the world who ever went to that doorway intent on locating Doorman's position through trial and error. 

Here, for example, is an image of me standing too close to the wall. More of my right shoulder is cut off than it should be to match Doorman.  

So, that told me that I had to move east, and eventually, I discovered exactly where Doorman was standing: a few inches west of where the medial handrail was formerly located, and it matches what we see in the Wiegman film.

So, what does that say about Frazier's idea that Lovelady was standing at the bottom and over by the wall? It says that it's nonsense. It says that Frazier's memories about it are really just mental constructs that he defensively concocted out of a subconscious desire to reconcile the fact that he gave in to the pressure to identify Doorman as Lovelady. He's trying hard to make sense of it, but the ONLY way to make sense of it is recognize that the Doorman was Oswald. He's wearing Oswald's clothes. He has Oswald's slender build. When you look closely you see that he has Oswald's facial features (except for the hairline). He's doing Oswald's stance, and he's got Oswald's expression. He is mostly Oswald, and he is enough Oswald that has got to be Oswald. He can't not be Oswald. And the way to bridge the small gap is to recognize the role of photographic alteration- which was a trick played on Wesley Frazier. 

Frazier knows that Oswald was innocent. He said it in the tape. Well, the interviewer said it first, but Wesley said that, yes, Oswald was innocent. 

Well, if Oswald was innocent, then some very evil people killed the President. And when you realize that they blew out the President's brain in broad daylight, why would you doubt that they would alter a photograph to cover it up? 

I have spoken to Robert Groden on the phone at length, and I don't think he's savable. I think his ego is way too big to admit that he's been wrong for 50 years and that back during the HSCA, he aided and abetted the killers of President Kennedy. 

But, just from listening to him, I think that Wesley Frazier is savable, that he could come around to the truth. I think the day may come when Wesley Frazier admits that it was Oswald in the doorway.