Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Jesue Christie. The Idiot is now spouting back what I said to him and claiming it as his own. Yes, the overhead arch causes shadow. Yes, if you're forward on that platform the sun reaches you, but if you're back in the shadow, then your eyes are OK. Black Hole Man is visoring his eyes, hence, he must be pretty damn forward. If he were back under the arch, then the shade from the arch would be shielding his eyes, and he would have no need to visor. It's the visoring that proves that he was forward, just like Doorman.  

Doorman was forward, close to the edge of the landing. In fact, he was VERY forward. His feet were probably hanging over the edge. Remember what happened to me. I wound up with shade on the top part of my face because I wasn't quite forward enough. You really have to be forward to avoid the shading effect of that overhang. And Black Hole Man was apparently forward enough to be getting light in his eyes, which is why he is visoring his eyes. The question is: why don't we see the LOWER part of his face? There is absolutely no reason why it shouldn't be visible. There is absolutely no object that is casting shadow on the lower part of his face. Certainly not his hands and not anything else. The top of his chest is in light, so why shouldn't the lower part of his face be in light? 

There is NO natural, spontaneous, unintentional reason why Black Hole Man's entire face should be cast black. The reason was intentional. His face was blackened out on purpose. And it's because it was the face of Billy Lovelady. 

Backass, that image on the left is a monstrosity. It is an affront to all intelligent people. And those, including you, who defend it as a legitimate, unaltered image, are soaked in the blood of John Kennedy, Lee Oswald, and many, many others.