Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

There is no truth to what Backes is claiming that there is something significantly different to the way these two images were rendered which makes it impossible to intelligently compare their content. 

We can plainly see that one man was significantly stockier than the other. He also had his shirt splayed open- in contrast to the other. His hair was different. His ears were different. The shape of his head was different. And none of these features have anything to do with how his image was rendered or how the other was rendered.

Let's go back to our example of Arnold Schwartzenegger and Danny Devito. Here they are in separate images, one from footage and the other from a photo. 

  
So, each involved a different medium, but should we therefore say that we cannot distinguish them, that we can't notice differences in size, shape, hair, and other variables? That, of course, is insane. Well, it's just as insane with these two.

These were two different men, Backass. Even Jim DiEugenio said on Education Forum that the difference between them in weight was 15 to 20 pounds. I happen to think that it's more than that, but hey, 15 to 20 pounds is 15 to  20 pounds. A man can't be 15 to 20 pounds heavier than himself at the same moment in time and space. 

There is a very good recognition now in the JFK online community that the images of Lovelady at the Dallas PD were faked. I am not having any trouble selling the idea to people. And recognition of it is certain to grow in the months and years ahead, while you are powerless to stop it. In fact, you should keep talking about it because it only draws more attention to it.