Thursday, June 25, 2015
O'Blase', I posted the man's letter, his own words, which clearly state what he believes. Are you saying that I composed the letter and am fraudulently attributing it to Vincent Salandria?
I just read your article. You have done excellent work. But permit me a serious criticism. You have given me far, far too much credit.
Finally, I do not want you to have the impression that I do not consider this micro analytical work of Oswald in the doorway of the Texas Book Depository Building as unimportant. On the contrary, I view it as critical for the citizenry to learn that Oswald was in fact in the doorway of the building at the time President Kennedy was being executed.
Once that simple fact of Oswald in the doorway is discerned by the public, our people will be able to understand the meaning of the JFK assassination. When the people become convinced that Oswald was in the doorway, and was not on the sixth floor of the Texas Book Depository sniping at President Kennedy, the public will recognize that he was a predesignated patsy. It then will become manifestly clear to people that the Warren Commission report was fraudulent. Our citizenry knows that no institution other than the powerful U.S.national security could have had the resources and control over our press and the institutions of government to cause them for more than a half of a century to promote and commit to the Oswald single-assassin myth.
Oswald in the doorway is a key through which the average citizen can open the door to the truth that our republic has been overthrown by a military-intelligence coup.
More recently, Vince wrote this in response to me, and it is directly from my email:
Dear Larry and Ralph,
Thank you. Prestigious name? I fear that you guys got shortchanged.
On Jun 23, 2015, at 4:16 PM, Ralph Cinque <email@example.com> wrote:
Have a great summer, Vince. And thank you again for adding your prestigious name to this organization. Ralph
And no, O'Blase'. No one thinks Lovelady was Oswald; but we know damn well that Doorman was Oswald. It's plain as day that the man is wearing Oswald's clothes. I said: the man is wearing Oswald's clothes.
You are rotten, O'Blazney, and I mean truly vile.