This, of course, is the Moorman photo. The consensus seems to be that it corresponds in time to Zapruder 315-316, and I accept that. However, if you believe as I do that Kennedy's head got blown out in back, how come we are not seeing that in the Moorman photo? His head in back looks perfectly intact to me.
So, on that basis, I have to think that ANYONE of any stripe who believes that the official story is nonsense, who believes that a Grassy Knoll shooter struck Kennedy in the right temple with a frangible (explosive) bullet, driving his head back and to the left, and causing a blowout of his head in back, must conclude that this photo was altered.
So, it seems to me that you CAN'T be an Oswald defender without endorsing photographic alteration in the JFK assassination. The two are inseparable.