Well, this JFK Assassination Forum certainly is a livelier group and a larger gathering than McAdam's. Perhaps it's because the long delays from moderating bogs down his forum so much.
But, on the other hand, I'm not impressed so far with the caliber of the thinking on Duncan's forum. The people can't stay on point, and they can't even see the point. This was my last entry:
It doesn't matter what Oswald's alibi could or would be. The fact is that he was accused of committing a murder which he denied doing. In that case, the alibi follows the denial like night follows day. "I didn't do it. I couldn't have because...."
That's how it works in this universe- if not the one you're living in.
And if you're a cop, you don't have to be Joe Friday to know that you need to solicit an alibi and write it down.
So, my points are two:
1. the omission of Oswald's Tippit alibi from the police and FBI reports, and the lack of objection to it by WC, HSCA, etc. are a smoking gun of system-wide deceit and corruption.
2. Oswald must have given one hell of an alibi- one that blew the official story to Kingdom Come.