Friday, February 19, 2016
Chris, Carolyn Arnold changing her story after 5000+ days is OK with you; but, it's not OK with me. And I don't consider it evidence.
Evidence refers to a material something- actual physical evidence- OR some factual information that is relevant to the case. Carolyn Arnold's 5000+ day revision cannot be considered factual information as per what Oswald did. It doesn't reach the threshold of factual information- and far from it.
Get this in your head: I don't accept the veracity of what she said 5000+ days later. Therefore, it is not evidence to me. And don't you assume that I am obliged to accept it; I'm not.
And no, Oswald could NOT have been referring to the 2nd floor lunch room because he referenced Jarman and Norman coming in, and they meant the 1st floor lunch room.
The 1st floor lunch room was where the "order-fillers" ate. The smaller lunch room on the 2nd floor was for the clerical workers who worked up there. There is are no grounds whatsoever to assume that Oswald was talking about the second floor.
But, I'm glad you revealed your contempt for Oswald. What a weird wacky world the "JFK community" is where even his defenders trash him. But, you are NOT his defender, and I have known that for a long time.