Well, I can't say there isn't irony to Backes' stupidity. Of the two of us, the only one who has done detailed reviews of JFK books is me, having recently done a 5 part series on The Devil's Chessboard by David Talbot. But, when you are as stupid as Backes, this is what that generates:
"Oh, that's right, you don't do books."
And then, the blithering idiot has the nerve to say:
"Try the ones written by Harold Weisberg."
No, I have a better idea: Why don't YOU try the ones by Harold Weisberg? That's the Harold Weisberg who advocated that Oswald was the Man in the Doorway of the Altgens photo.
Why don't you start by reading his Photographic Whitewash I, and Photographic Whitewash II, and Photographic Whitewash III?
Why don't you try reading Harold Weisberg's deposition in the Garrison investigation?
You stupid idiot! Harold Weisberg was a staunch and unwavering advocate of Oswald in the doorway! He was on my side! Not your side!
Stupid, idiotic Backes tried unsuccessfully to dissuade Professor Gerald McKnight from joining the OIC when the good professor has been proclaiming the OIC position since long before there was an OIC; decades before. Professor McKnight declared Oswald in the doorway on national television on Christmas Day 2012 on C-Span in a televised debate. And yet, Backes, not being too good at logic, thought that McKnight should side with him? Don't you get it, Moron? I support Dr. McKnight; you trash him. So, who's he going to go with?
Oh, you don't trash him by name, but you trash what he says, and that amounts to the same thing.
And no, Numbskull: this is not a Moire pattern:
It's the exact same image as the one below except that it was flooded with light.
It's the exact same photo except with fill-light. So, why would you call it a Moire pattern? Do you even know what a Moire pattern is?
That black smudge on Emory Robert's chin and mouth is not a natural photographic effect. It is a deliberate smudge to hide what he's doing, which is talking on the car phone during the shooting.
And I am not the only one who says so. Here is Vincent Palamara:
"Although Agent Roberts admitted recognizing 'Oswald's' first shot as a rifle blast,27 as the Altgens photo confirms, he made a mysterious transmission via radio microphone that is not accounted for in his reports or in the official record. Instead of offering a shout of alarm, alert, or orders to his agents to do something that their own initiative lacked for some reason, ie., protective action, he did nothing to help the wounded President."
You're stupid, Backes, and the only thing you accomplish with your stupid rants is to demonstrate your own idiocy and corruption.
The Oswald Innocence Campaign is the strongest force in the world today for JFK truth. We have solidarity. We have mutual respect for each other. We have high esteem for our chairman, Larry Rivera. We have daily exchanges. And we have the commitment and the determination to see this through. Like Oswald in the doorway, we are going to be the last ones standing.
Oswald innocence based on the fact that he was standing in the doorway during the shooting is the crux of JFK truth, and it is going to demolish the official story. It is demolishing it. These are the end times for the official story, and it is absolutely certain that it will dissolve away, and all that will be left is to identify the culprits who tried so hard to prop it up and keep it going. You'll be counted among them, Backes. You are one of them. It is who you are and what you are about.