But, at some point, as we bickered, he began trashing Oswald in the doorway. I didn't care for that. Naturally, I responded aggressively.
The reason I am posting this is because I kept waiting for Scott to say where Oswald really was, if not the doorway, but he never said.
It always amazes me when someone who professes to be an Oswald defender (which Scott does) denies Oswald in the doorway without feeling any need to place him anywhere else. It's like Lee Harvey Oswald was immaterial; he just floated in the ether. We don't have to place him anywhere. Who knows where he was? He could have been anywhere- or nowhere. And it is beyond human knowledge to know where he was. All we can know is where he wasn't- and that is the doorway. There's no need to waste time trying to understand what happened and where he really was and what he was doing at the crucial time. He wasn't on the 6th floor, and he wasn't in the doorway, and that's where the thinking stops- if it ever started.
The point is that it's different for a guy like Scott Kaiser. He's not like David Von Pein. I don't have to wonder what Peinhead thinks. Peinhead thinks Oswald was on the 6th floor shooting at Kennedy. That's a given. Then, there are the nihilists who are non-committal on everything except the doorway, who say,
"Oswald may have been innocent, or he may have been guilty. Believe what you want about that. Just don't think he was in the doorway."
Those types are complete fakes and phonies. They're just put here to be trouble-makers.
But, Scott Kaiser isn't one of those guys either. He definitely thinks Oswald was framed and innocent. So, where was he at the time of the shots? Amazingly, Scott, like many others, vouches for him NOT being in the doorway without saying where he was, as if it doesn't matter. And he didn't even say as much. The whole question sailed over his head; it didn't even register on his radar. That's the degree of mind-warp that is involved.
People, this is 2016. If you are going to deny that Oswald was in the doorway, yet you claim that he was innocent, hence, not on the 6th floor shooting at Kennedy, then you HAVE to say where he was. And that's because it's 2016. Over 50 years have passed, with a spotlight being put on this and everything that happened that day, and therefore: there is no excuse for not knowing. If, after half a century, you don't know where Oswald was at 12:30, then you need the shut the fuck up about the JFK assassination because you don't know shit from shinola about it.
I'll start where we were talking about the Op 40 photo from Mexico City in which Scott tried to claim that the Rafael Cruz figure was Frank Bartes. But, he had no image of Bartes with which to compare, and it's obvious from his bio that Bartes had to be much older than the young guy in the photo.