Saturday, August 20, 2016

John King says that this version of the Jackson photo, which he found online and posted a link to on McAdams forum, which shows less of Oswald's index finger, looks the way it does because it's "higher contrast" that the "light portions are lighter and the dark portions are darker." But, that is NOT the case. If anything, it's just darker. Its lights certainly are NOT lighter, as you can readily see on the left below. 

And that makes no sense anyway because the index finger is a "light" so it should appear "lighter" and thus stand out more. 

And even if I darken the one on the right, it still shows the more abundant index finger.

So, that's that, and here is the one from John King again:

So, John King is just blowing smoke with his explanation. He doesn't know what he's talking about. The fact is that there is a material difference which can't be explained away by his blather. 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.