Tuesday, December 6, 2016

On the 9/11 Truth front, from the Architects and Engineers:

Press Release Issued:

Former NIST Employee Takes Courageous Stand

Share Widely — Help Finish Our Fund Drive Today!

Earlier today, AE911Truth issued a press release through PR Newswire to every news outlet in the country about the emergence of Peter Michael Ketcham, the former NIST employee who is speaking out against his former agency’s World Trade Center investigation. We encourage you to download the release today and share it with everyone you know.

Since last Wednesday, we’ve received $3,500 of the $5,000 budget for our rapid response publicity effort, thanks to the generous donations of 100 supporters.

Please help us finish the fundraising drive today so that we’ll be able to produce a high-quality video interview with Mr. Ketcham, which we’re confident will be seen by hundreds of thousands of people when it’s released a few weeks from now. We’re especially thrilled because a very distinguished individual has agreed to interview Mr. Ketcham — so stay tuned!


The Story on Peter M. Ketcham, In Case You Missed It

Last week, Europhysics News released its first issue since the publication of “15 years later: On the physics of high-rise building collapses,” which has now been viewed nearly 350,000 times.

Lo and behold, on page 43 is a startling and extraordinary letter to the editor by a former employee of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Peter Michael Ketcham, who worked at NIST from 1997 until 2011.

In his letter, Mr. Ketcham makes clear that he did not contribute to NIST’s World Trade Center investigation. In fact, it wasn't until last August that he began reading the NIST WTC reports and watching documentaries challenging NIST’s findings. The more he investigated, he writes, “the more it became apparent that NIST had reached a predetermined conclusion by ignoring, dismissing, and denying the evidence.”

Mr. Ketcham closes his stunning 500-word rebuke by calling upon NIST to “blow the whistle on itself now” before awareness of the “disconnect between the NIST WTC reports and logical reasoning” grows exponentially.

The courageous stand Mr. Ketcham has taken in criticizing the reports issued by his former employer of 14 years is yet another sign of the rapidly increasing skepticism toward the official 9/11 narrative among scientific and technical professionals. No doubt, his emergence will help accelerate the path toward exposing NIST's WTC reports as false and unscientific.

Ralph Cinque: You can read Mr. Ketcham's letter to the Euro-Physics Journal here:

What an appalling and outrageous theory NIST came up with, that the Towers, including Building 7 which was never hit by a plane and had only scant, minimal fires, were felled due to "office fires."
And, I hope you caught Mr. Ketcham's reference to it being a "predetermined conclusion." What does that remind you of? How about the Warren Commission's "predetermined conclusion" that Lee Harvey Oswald killed Kennedy? That is most certainly what it was: a predetermined conclusion. 

And, such predetermined conclusions are almost always the product of government because only the institution of government has the kind of close-minded, blinders-on "group-think" that can result in such brazenly wrong conclusions. Groupthink, a term coined by social psychologist Irving Janis in 1972, occurs when a group makes faulty decisions because group pressures lead to a deterioration of “mental efficiency, reality testing, and moral judgment."

Another example are the HSCA archeologists who found for Lovelady in the Doorman controversy.  

I wish everyone would realize that the government can NEVER honestly investigate anything. There needs to be a new 9/11 investigation but by architect, engineers, physicists, demolition experts, forensic experts, etc. who are independent, who are not beholden to the government. Government will always seek to protect itself and hide its crimes. 

Things are looking up for 9/11 truth, just as they are looking up for JFK truth. And there is no doubt that each will end up with the ransacking and utter destruction of the official stories. 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.