Wednesday, January 25, 2017

7:23 PM (21 minutes ago)
- hide quoted text -
On Wednesday, January 25, 2017 at 9:17:24 AM UTC-6, David Von Pein wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 24, 2017 at 4:01:53 PM UTC-5, claviger wrote:
> > Or maybe not.
> >
> >
> Is that supposed to be the same man on both sides of that photo montage?
> It doesn't look like the same guy to me.
That's the point.  In one photo his profile does look like a young G H W
Bush.  In the next photo with him facing the camera it obviously is not
Bush.  Yes it is the same guy.  Check the coat and tie closely.  Notice
the texture of the coat. 

Ralph Cinque:

It's just more photographic fraud. The texture of the coat was faked. It was altered. It's not in the original photo. 

And, I showed how they doctored his tie to make it match the other.

This is rather conspicuous photographic fraud, as photographic fraud goes. I also pointed out that the other man's tie was longer, or at least it appears to be longer, and it's probably because he wasn't nearly as tall as Bush. The man on the left certainly appears to be Bush's height, which was 6'2", but the man on the right appears to be quite a bit shorter. They are most definitely NOT the same man. 

Understand something, claviger: With the JFK assassination, the issue of photographic alteration is always front and center. It looms large whenever a JFK assassination image is being considered. The idea that we just trust and accept the legitimacy of all the images is comical, at best. And if you expect otherwise, you are being obtuse.   

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.