Why didn't the mainstream media point out that Bob Vanderslice's claim stood in contrast to and in conflict with multiple testimonies from people who were with Jack Ruby at the Dallas Morning News at the time of the motorcade? These included the Advertising Editor and the Entertainment Editor. And it included Ruby himself, who said he was there, and the idea that these individuals conspired with Jack Ruby to lie about it is preposterous. Why not at least make their readers aware that this scenario exists and is well-supported? But, they didn't do that. They just reported the Vanderslice story, as if it exists in a vacuum. And that is really despicable that they would feed a false conspiracy story in that manner. Here is CBS, as an example, and it's typical. NO mainstream media outlet addressed this issue and gave the complete picture of the evidence concerning Jack Ruby's whereabouts. They were just baiting the buffs.