Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

I tell you, this is weird. Here I was having this argument with "Lance Upperton" and suddenly Steve Haydon shows up and steps right into it like he was there all along. Here are Steve's first two posts: 

Steve Haydon Yes, there's a book - nonetheless they have stated that it's a primary objective to locate the films for confirmation either way.
They have had to write 50 books to keep up with the junk you've put out in the last 5 years...

Like · Reply · 38 mins

Ralph Cinque The only good thing about the Prayer Man theory is that it does admit that Oswald COULD be in the doorway. And obviously, it rejects that he was on the 6th floor shooting at Kennedy. You might think I would be grateful that, but I'm not. Not my nature. What they get from me is spit and contempt.

Like · Reply · 36 mins

Ralph Cinque Ptoi!

Like · Reply · 36 mins

Steve Haydon Meanwhile you STILL continue to avoid the point I was making which has absolutely nothing to do with the viability or otherwise of the Prayer Man issue. Pathetic....

I'll remind you that he quickly changed "I" to "he" when I called him on it. 

And notice something else: He put his comment in the wrong thread. Read what came before by me. His response has nothing to do with what I wrote.

Ralph Cinque Lance is much more tolerant of his friend Joseph Backes, who for months- not hours but months- claimed that this man, Detective TL Baker, was James Bookhout. Even Denis Morrissette and Linda Zambanini, each of whom have sites devoted to ID'ing the law enforcement figures surrounding the JFK assassination and Oswald, say he is Baker. But, Backes insisted that this tall guy at the Midnight Press Conference, which Bookhout by his own admission didn't even attend, is Bookhout, and has never retracted it, that I know of. Even after I informed Backes that Bookhout was short, which we know because he had to stand on a pedestal to see over reporters to find Hosty in the hallway, and because he said that although he was on Main Street during the motorcade, that he couldn't lay eyes on JFK because there were people in front of him, Backes still wouldn't drop the claim. But, not a peep out of Lance about that. He doesn't mind. Lance ( an alias) has NEVER made a comment anywhere in the JFK world except to attack me. He has NEVER contributed anything JFK or Oswald related except in response to me. He has never done any original research. He is a just a cyber hit-man aimed at me. And it doesn't matter because I have no trouble beating him, but still, it shows you who he is.

Like · Reply · 1 · 15 hrs · Edited

Ralph Cinque replied · 48 Replies · 43 mins

Steve Haydon Yes, there's a book - nonetheless they have stated that it's a primary objective to locate the films for confirmation either way.
They have had to write 50 books to keep up with the junk you've put out in the last 5 years...

Like · Reply · 42 mins

Do you see where it says 48 replies? Well, that's where the discussion was taking place. It was a sub-thread within the thread. But, he lost his place and responded out of kilter. But then, Steve goes on to refer to Lance's writing as something "I" said? I have never seen that happen before in my 66 years. Mistakes happen all the time, but I have NEVER seen that one.