Backes says that, since 2011, I have been pissing on JFK's grave.
Let's consider how much sense that makes in light of what we know.
I maintain that Oswald was framed and innocent, and that the conspiracy to kill JFK went to the highest levels of government, including the very law enforcement that was prosecuting him.
Supposedly, Backes maintains that Oswald was framed and innocent, and that the conspiracy to kill JFK went to the highest levels of government, including the very law enforcement that was prosecuting him. Doesn't he maintain that the Dallas Police concocted the bus and cab rides, which included phony evidence and phony witnesses, all to frame Oswald?
So, what's the difference between me and him? Well, I maintain that at the time of the shooting, Oswald was not on the 6th floor but was in the doorway. Backes maintains that at the time of the shooting, Oswald was not on the 6th floor but was somewhere else in the building. However, he thinks Oswald may have been in the doorway because he has been open and receptive to the Prayer Man idea and respectful to those who espouse it.
What is the essence of the case? What is the question at the very center of the case? It is whether Oswald was innocent or guilty. And supposedly, Backes agrees with me that Oswald was innocent. The second-most important question is who really killed Kennedy, and Backes agrees that it was done by people in power. I don't know that he actually names anybody, but if he believes the Dallas Police concocted Oswald's bus and cab rides, he has to think that the government was involved. If the DPD was doing that, creating a conspiracy within the conspiracy, doesn't it mean that Curry and Fritz were involved? And doesn't it mean that others, higher up, put them up to it? And Backes has accused the Warren Commission of concocting whole swaths of testimony, such as Shelley and Lovelady's "trek to the tracks." So, he admits that the Warren Commission was totally corrupt too and in on framing Oswald.
So, Backes, like me, thinks Oswald was innocent and that he was definitely not on the 6th floor. And he thinks he may have been in the doorway. Leastways, Backes has never claimed that Oswald was anywhere else at 12:30, i.e., in any other specific spot.
So, on the basis of that difference- where I am certain that Oswald was in the doorway during the shooting while Backes isn't sure but admits he may have been in the doorway- Backes has it that I am pissing on JFK's grave?????
That doesn't make sense. So, what is Backes doing? Is he pissing on JFK's grave? No. I wouldn't put it that way. He's doing much worse than that. This is what he is doing:
It's what they are all doing to JFK every day of their miserable lives: killing him, over and over and over and over again.
You know the story of Prometheus, right? In Greek mythology, Prometheus was a god who gave mankind the gift of knowledge, and in punishment, the other gods chained him to a rock on a mountain, where an eagle would eat his liver throughout the day, pecking at it, devouring it, torturing him. But then, his liver would regenerate at night, so that he could suffer all over again the next day and every day for eternity.
And that, unfortunately, is how it is for JFK because every single day, he is killed all over again by the bastards who are fighting JFK truth.
Backes says I am pissing on JFK's grave? Oh really? Look in the mirror at what you are doing, Backes. You are killing him.