There seems to be no end to the circularity of some people's reasoning. Willing are they to just say the same things over and over, even after they have been refuted.
You can't use a digitally altered photo to represent what is present on CE 369. If we were allowed to do that, then we might as well say that there is no arrow at all.
Arrow? What arrow? I don't see no stinkin' arrow.
The only thing we can do, the only thing we can work with, is the unaltered photo. And I like this one from history-matters because you can easily blow it up using their instrument:
When I refer people to that link, I am removing myself from the equation. I, obviously, haven't done anything to the history-matters website, and I couldn't if I wanted to.
So, that's what it is, and obviously, it has the appearance of one arrow.
That's it. There's nothing else. Once you start altering the image, you no longer have what Joseph Ball had. You're in the world of fantasy, of imagination. You're not in reality. You're in an alternate, imaginary realm that has no bearing on the discussion. This is what Joseph Ball was looking at in his discussion with Lovelady. This is what they were talking about. This is what they were seeing as they were moving their lips. This is the image that reached their eyes. Not anything else. Not anything else. Stop the nonsense.