So, what is this?
It's look like someone doing a jumping jack. It certainly does not look like an 11 year old waving:
So, what is this below? It is techno-art.
Today, it's amazing how authentic computer-generated images can be.
I think it's amazing that anyone could conceive of such beauty, that they would know how to being to create such a vision starting from a blank slate. But, besides her attractiveness, the whole photographic quality of the image is spot-on perfect. It looks real.
So, why does this look so crude and cartoonish?
Well, it was 1963. I don't know what crude method they used, but I am sure it was crude.
But, you know it's not Toni Glover.
Her hair is different. They gave her just one loop of hair on the right instead of a thick mane. Her hands are different. Look at the size of those mitts on the right compared to the small delicate hands on the left. She was 11 years old.
On the right, it isn't real. One would have to be very obtuse and immature to deny it.