No, Backes. What happened is that diligent research determined that the Altgens photo should have proportions of exactly 2:3. And that revealed that Ken was basing his claim on a stretched version of the Altgens photo, assuming this one is for real:
As for me and my mistakes, I've made some minor ones, very minor ones, and quickly reversed them upon realizing it. But, as chance would have it, nothing I have ever put on the OIC website has ever had to be removed for being spurious. I've never made any mistakes there. The phony Loveladys? They are still up there because they really are fake. The phony Woman and Boy from Altgens and Woman and Baby from Towner? They're still up there because they're fake too. The seven anomalies in the Altgens doorawy? Still there and still fake. The phony they Doorman they added to the Wiegman film after Oswald left just to fill the void? He's there too because he wasn't Oswald; wasn't Lovelady'; and wasn't anybody who was there.
So, the taller one who seems to jump is real, and he was Oswald. The one who seems to be bald with a round head and is a step lower, he was nobody. At least, he was nobody we know. And he wasn't there. They just put him into the film, where he looks stiff as a cigar store Indian.
It's all still there, Backes, and nothing you or anybody has said has given me cause to take any of it down. The JFK assassination is the most photographically altered event in the history of Man.
We of the OIC maintain three things as our core beliefs:
1) Oswald was innocent; framed and innocent
2) Oswald was standing in the doorway during the shots
3) A massive amount of photographic and film alteration was done, both before and after the assassination, to cover up 1 and 2.
A rat in a maze may make some wrong turns, but if he's smart, he will correct his course and get back on track, with no harm done. And it's the same way here. The amazing thing is just how few mistakes have been in trying to solve this maze. I am completely satisfied with the record, my record.