Frances T. Shure is a clinical psychologist, and she is a regular columnist for the Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth. She recently wrote an article about the role of the Media in cultivating acceptance of the official 9/11 story by the public. And she claims that that role is enormous, that the acceptance stems directly from the media. Really, one should say the government and the media, which are intertwined. And she admits that we do not have an independent press in this country any more, that it's all Pravda now. CBS, NBC, ABC, FOX, the New York Times, the Washington Post, TIME, Newsweek, etc., you name it- they are all Pravda. We have fully reached the Orwellian world.
And everything she says about it applies as much to JFK assassination truth as it does to 9/11 truth. Not only is there no discussion of disputing theories of the JFK assassination in the mainstream press, there isn't even any recognition that they exist. Realize that, overwhelmingly, those who dispute the JFK assassination do so on the basis of Oswald innocence, and the very idea of that is forbidden. It is taboo. It is hush-hush. When they conduct polls, it's always, "Do you think Oswald acted alone or acted within a conspiracy?" What an outrage that is.
Ms. Shure acknowledges that the media likes to portray 9/11 truthers as mental cases; as mal-adjusted, unstable, unhinged, anti-social people. Ditto for JFK truthers. Both are called "conspiracy theorists" and in both cases, it is a misnomer. For 9/11 truthers, it's wrong because the official story involves conspiracy as much as the other. It's a question of which conspiracy you want to believe. And in the case of JFK, the issue is NOT conspiracy either. The issue is whether Oswald was guilty or innocent. "Conspiracy" is a red herring in both cases.
But, after reading Ms. Shure's article on the media, and the death of investigative journalism (and note that it's dead as far as investigating government stories and government claims) I am drawn back to the recent occurrence of the mainstream media all brandishing the story about Jack Ruby going to watch the "fireworks" in Dealey Plaza. That little ditty completely and totally trashes and undermines the official story of the JFK assassination- to the core. And yet, they reported it without challenging it, without questioning it, and without contesting it in any way. They offered no "other side." They just spewed it: uncritically. Now how, in the name of Almighty God, could they do that after more than a half a century of degrading and ridiculing anyone and everyone wh refuses to accept the official story? What about all the articles psychoanalyzing the disturbed, mal-adjusted, dys-functional conspiracy theorists? In one full swoop, they joined them? Fact: the articles all put forward the fireworks story as an undisputed fact without the slightest reservation or doubt. how How HOW could they do that? I mean: what an insult. After decades of cramming the official lone nut story down our throats, they were then glibly saying "Nah, I guess we were wrong. Ruby was in on it." Of course, they didn't say that outright, but if Ruby had foreknowledge then he was involved with the plotters. And, it would really be stupid to think that it was a conspiracy that involved just Ruby and Oswald and no one else. So, if Ruby had foreknowledge, the conspiracy had to be larger than that- much larger than that. That is implied. And there the media was effectively endorsing it. So, what the hell is going on? I'll tell you what I think.
First, with so many media outlets reporting the story, and reporting it the same way, meaning, without reservation, doubt, challenge, etc. it's obvious that this was CENTRALLY ordered. It's not as though every paper made the decision to do it that way. The articles were all essentially the same. It was pre-written. It came down from above. It came down from Authority. And exactly who that Authority was, I don't know. Perhaps the CIA or the FBI. But, a decision was made, from deep within the Deep State, that the media was going to carry this story. And as servants of the government, the media did.
But, why did the Deep State want this story promulgated? I'll tell you why: IT'S BECAUSE THEY KNOW THERE ARE ALWAYS GOING TO BE JFK TRUTHERS, AND THEY VERY MUCH WANT TO GUIDE AND CONTROL THE WAY THEY THINK AND THE DIRECTION THEY GO. THEY WANT TO LEAD THE JFK TRUTH MOVEMENT. WHICH IS TO SAY THAT THEY WANT TO MISLEAD IT- TO RENDER IT HARMLESS.
And, leading them to think that Jack Ruby was a JFK plotter was the perfect red herring. Nothing could be further from the truth. He had no involvement whatsoever. Absolutely none. But, if you think he did, then that reinforces your acceptance of him having shot Oswald. And that's what they want. They don't want you, mentally, to go anywhere near considering that he didn't do it. That's what really matters to them: they want you to forever believe that he did it. And, they don't give a rat's ass what motive YOU want to assign as to WHY Ruby did it. To silence Oswald? To appease the Mafia? To become a hero? To protect his family? To save Jackie from having to come back to Dallas? Take your pick. They don't care. They just want you to believe that he did it. The nightmare for them would be if you started to doubt it.
Now, you would think that if the media really believed this story that Jack Ruby had foreknowledge of the JFK assassination, that he knew there was going to be "fireworks" in Dealey Plaza, that they would be all over it, seeking to find the connection. But, it's not a matter of them believing it. It's a matter of them following orders. They were ordered to publish the article. So, they did. Period.
And odds are great that it was a one-time thing. It's not as though they are going to keep harping on it.
Here is the link to the article by Frances Shure about the state of the media in this country. We are living in a time of non-reality, of fake news. There is a morbid gargoyle at the core of power in this country, and I'm not referring to Trump. The media is just the arm of the gargoyle.