Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

So, the gist of it is that TIME magazine said that it had images of Oswald from his arrest which suggest he was guilty, but they don't. The images are completely neutral.

This was TIME magazine which has multiple layers of filtering and editing. So, how could they make that claim when there is NOTHING about the images that says anything about Oswald's guilt?

And why didn't they say anything about Bentley's smirk?

The President of the United States had just been killed. He was declared dead less than an hour before. A Dallas Police officer had been killed half an hour before. What the hell is he smirking for? What the hell is he smoking a cigar for? Why didn't TIME magazine observe that?