Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Anthony Marsh

1:21 PM (1 hour ago)

Re: Why you can't play the Chronology card with "out with Bill

On 11/6/2015 6:08 PM, Ralph Cinque wrote:
> How can the notes possibly be chronological when they feature his
> lunch-eating after his encounter with Truly and Baker? They say:
>
> Claims 2nd floor Coke when Officer came in
> To 1st floor had lunch
>
> Oswald did not eat lunch after his encounter with Truly and Baker.
>

As we've pointed out hundreds of time the Fritz notes were not in
chronological order.

> According to the Warren Commission, his encounter with Truly and Baker
> occurred 90 seconds after the last shot. Then he got his Coke because he
> didn't have it at the time of the encounter, according to both Truly and
> Baker, and I don't think either was lying about it. Then he walked through

They covered up the Baker affidavit where he said Oswald had the Coke in
his hand.

> the office area and had his encounter with Mrs. Reid, which was the same
> way he got there. Then, when he got downstairs, he got his jacket. Then he

He mistakenly left his jacket on the shelf.

> gave two men directions to the payphone. And then he left for home. And
> the time that stepped outside the building, according to the Warren
> Commission, was 12:33, which was just 3 minutes after the last shot.
>
> So, how do you squeeze eating lunch into that? Never mind eating it with
> Jarman and Norman.
>

Wow, you think it takes Oswald 20 minutes to eat his sandwich?

> It proves that the notes are NOT chronological. And you are not being
> logical.
>

We told you that before. 

Ralph Cinque:

Marsh, you should never use the word "we" in reference to anything because, as I've observed, no one agrees with you about anything. There is no "we" when it comes to you. You may be the only person, living or dead, who has ever thought that Oswald did not shoot Kennedy but did shoot Tippit.

Oswald left for home at 12:33 according to the WC. That's just 3 minutes after the shooting. So, how could he go to the lunch room, have an encounter with Truly and Baker, then get a Coke, then have an encounter with Mrs. Reid, then go downstairs and get his jacket, then give two men directions to the pay phone and get outside by 12:33 if he also had to include lunch-eating in the mix?

You are some piece of work the way you glibly dismiss things as being ridiculous when the one who is ridiculous is you. 

After all this time, you still think that Baker corrected his own affidavit, that he decided that he better not be truthful about the Coke, and therefore he crossed it out????????????????  Were that the case, would he not have rewritten it? For otherwise, wouldn't it have broadcast it just as well?????? Just imagine, for a moment, that he was a smarter man than you are. It's not hard to imagine.