Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

This is said to be Prayer Man in the Wiegman film.

And here it is flooded with light.

And here it is cropped:

And here it is compared to Prayer Man:

I would say first that there is not enough data in the image on the left to make any sense of it. What is the person doing? How is he or she configured? And how does it correlate to the image on the right? In other words: he went from what to what? And I also think that the image on the right was photoshopped to give it more detail than it had. Here is a crop from the clip that Robin Unger posted today from the JFK movie. This is all you get from the clip that Unger posted:

"I  finally managed to separate the small 13-second Darnell segment from the JFK Blu Ray and have UPLOADED it to YouTube." 

That's what he said, and this is what he got:

Why is the image on the right so much better, and where did it come from? What's the reality? Who knows? Anything is possible including that the whole thing is fake. It certainly seems like a strange behavior that 10 seconds after the last shot, this person is standing there facing in that direction. Doesn't he have an inkling that a catastrophe has happened? 

Here is the scene outside the doorway at large. 

So, that is 10 seconds after the last shot. Where are Lovelady and Shelley? I know! They left for the railroad tracks. If Shelley hung around for 3 or 4 minutes, as is stated in one of his testimonies, which Brian Pete clings to in order to place Shelley out front when Oswald left for home, why don't we see Shelley here?  And, I'll tell you something else: Brian doesn't actually believe that. He doesn't really believe that Shelley was out in front when Oswald left for home. Brian often champions things he doesn't believe at all. He just argues for the sake of arguing. 

Just consider: if Shelley was really out in front when Oswald left for home, and Oswald saw him, then Shelley would have had to see Oswald as well. Right? The presumption that Oswald saw Shelley but Shelley didn't see Oswald is NOT reasonable or tenable. The reason is because it is a very small place, and it was even smaller then. And obviously, Oswald cited Shelley because he believed that Shelley would confirm their seeing each other. So, in other words, when Brian champions Shelley being out front when Oswald left, he is championing Shelley lying. That's because Shelley said he saw Oswald at 11:50 on the first floor and then not again until they were both at the PD. And if Shelley lied about that, then: SHELLEY IS BAD. He's no good. He's rotten.  He is implicated. It means that Oswald is good, and Shelley is bad. Brian didn't think about that. That's because Brian compartmentalizes all these issues.   

Another example is the idea that Oswald was in the domino room eating at 12:30. Brian doesn't believe that either, but he'll gladly argue it. That's because: it's not the doorway. But, if Oswald was eating at 12:30, then Fritz lied when he said that Oswald said he was eating with Jarman and Norman. And Fritz actually said that Oswald said he was eating with them, that it was a group thing. It is far more likely that Oswald just cited them as being around when he was eating- alone, as usual. And the idea that he was still eating at 12:30 makes no sense because it doesn't take that long. What also makes no sense is that Oswald would willfully and knowingly skip the motorcade to eat a cheese sandwich and an apple when he had plenty of time to eat beforehand. He knew that Kennedy was coming. He didn't know before he got to work. But, James Jarman told him about it at 9 AM. Oswald was wondering why people were gathering on the sidewalk, so he asked, and Jarman told him. 

Now why, and what possible reason would anyone have to assume that Oswald had no interest in seeing the Kennedys?

To confuse, to complicate, to discombobulate, that is what these Ops do. It is what they're trained to do. And if what they say today contradicts when they said yesterday, they don't care. Remember that debunking is all they do. When has Brian Pete ever written a blog in which he wasn't trying to debunk me or someone else? Never. When has he ever written a blog which discussed an aspect of the case just for itself, just to delve into it, without trying to attack anyone? Never. Not even once. It's like what Jack White said: "When all you do is debunk, it means you're an Op."