Monday, January 11, 2016

Keep in mind that if Jack Ruby really did shoot Oswald, fine. It's not like I need for him not to have. It's just that it bothers me that the photographic evidence is so equivocal and so lacking. I'd like to just see one clear piece of photographic evidence which shows that he did, and that's it; I'll be ready to move on. But so far, I haven't seen it. I haven't seen a single image which shows clear, unequivocal, undeniable damage to Oswald. 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.