He didn't. He dealt with it by not saying anything, as did Fritz. It was only Bookhout, in his separate report dictated on November 24, who brought up "out with Bill Shelley in front". And his way of dealing with it was to make the time later, which was a lie.
Why would Oswald have said that he saw Bill Shelley in front when he left for home when Shelley wasn't out there when he left for home? WHY LIE ABOUT SOMETHING THAT YOU DON'T NEED AN ALIBI FOR? Oswald didn't have to prove that he left for home. Everyone accepted that he left for home since he wound up home. So, he didn't anyone to confirm it. He had no reason to say that he saw Shelley at that time.
"I left for home. I really did. And if you don't believe me, ask Bill Shelley." It wasn't like that, and Oswald never would have said it. He wouldn't have lied about it, not if he was innocent, and not if he was guilty. He had no reason to.
You are really stupid, Unger. Jesus Christ, you would think they would get people with brains to do this. But, maybe that's the problem. No one with brains really wants to defend this shit.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.