I don't say that Fritz didn't position himself to give the shooter an opening. We agree about that, doofus. But, I say that Fritz did it knowing that the shooter was there, that Fritz had prior knowledge, prior awareness.
You claim that the shooter was Ruby. So explain how Fritz could have prior knowledge of Ruby being there, when Ruby, himself, didn't have prior knowledge that he was going to be there. He had no plan to be there. He had no intention of going there. That's proven by the fact that he brought his dog along. If he knew he was going to the police station to shoot Oswald, he would not have brought his dog along.
So, if Ruby didn't know, how could Fritz know?
I'm not denying that Fritz left the opening. I'm saying that the fact that he left the opening proves that he had prior knowledge. But of what? How could Fritz know that Ruby was going to be there? He didn't see Ruby there. I have proven that to you more than adequately. So, did somebody tell Fritz that Ruby was going to be there? But again, how is that possible when Ruby didn't even know himself?
The problem is not in recognizing that Fritz left an opening. The problem is in establishing how Fritz knew that Ruby was going to be there totin'. It's not a problem for me because I say Ruby wasn't even there, that Fritz conspired with Bookhout and others AGAINST Ruby. But, it is a problem for you because you maintain that Ruby was the shooter. So, how did Fritz know that Ruby was there ready to shoot? How did Fritz know that Ruby was there ready to shoot? How did Fritz know that Ruby was there ready to shoot? How did Fritz know that Ruby was there ready to shoot?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.